ALLAH FROWNS ON THOSE WHO ABSTAIN FROM HAVING SEX WITH THEIR SLAVE GIRLS
( Surah No. 66 AT- TAHRIM )
CONTEXT OF THE SURAH **
It was Hafsa’s turn to sleep with the Prophet .. Her maid Maria Quptia ( a gift from King of Alexandria) was also in her room when prophet walked in.. Maria was a very attractive and voluptuous young teenager.. She aroused carnal desires in any man who looked at her; then our Prophet was not any man, he was endowed with 30 man libido* by Allah. .
* Bukhari Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:
Narrated Qatada:
“ Prophet was given the sexual strength of thirty men”
To be alone with Maria, Prophet sent Hafsa to her Dad’s house with a phony excuse that Umar wanted to see her.
UMAR WAS AWAY PERFORMING SUNNA
Umar was not home, when Hafsa reached her Dad’s place few houses down the street.
Hafsa: “Mom Where is Dad”?
Mother: “He has gone to the Al Manasi field near Baqia to defecate”...
Hafsa: “Why doesn’t he go to the field behind our house”..
Mother: “Because it is a sunna to relieve yourself at the place where Prophet relieves himself”..
Hafsa: “I will wait for him” .
Mother :”It may be a long wait. He hides there afterwards to spy on prophet’s wives”.
Hafbsa: “Spy on prophet’s wives, what for”? .
Mother “To make sure they are veiled according to aya 33.59 when they come to relieve themselves. As you know this aya was sent* by Allah at your Dad’s request”.
* Bukhari Volume 8, Book 74, Number 257:
Narrated 'Aisha:
(the wife of the Prophet) 'Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah's Apostle "Let your wives be veiled" But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.' Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam'a went out and she was a tall woman. 'Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while she was (defecating) in a group, and said, "I have recognized you, O Sauda!" He ('Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the verse of veiling 33.59. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes). (See Hadith No. 148, Vol. 1)
* Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 395:
Narrated 'Umar (bin Al-Khattab): Allah agreed with me on three things and revealed ayas, one of them was
the verse of the veiling of the women (33.59) .
.Hafsa: “Well I cant wait that long. It is my turn with Prophet , he must be in bed waiting for me”.
PROPHET IN BED BUT NOT WAITING
When Hafsa returned, she found Preophet in bed but not waiting. He was in action with her maid Maria. Hafsa was outraged (she had a temper of her Dad Umar) and started hollering at him.
Hafsa: “Rasulullah you lied and and deceived me to screw my maid”?.
Prophet:” Hafsa mind your language. Aya 33.32* says you should talk to Allah’s Prophet in an a honorable manner”.
* 33.32 “O wives of the Prophet! Speak to the prophet in an honorable manner”..
Hafsa: “I will speak honorably to the prophet when the Prophet stops acting dishonorably himself”.
Prophet: “Having sex with slave girls is not dishonorable. Allah has made* them halal for me”.
*33.50 “Mohammed , sex with slave girls and captured women is halal for you*
Hafsa:” I don’t give a rat’s behind who is is halal for you and who is is not .. You can have sex with a she camel for all I care. But I don’t want it in my bed and on my night”.
Prophet: “Hafsa ,calm down. I will tell you something. If you keep this incident a secret between you and me and don’t tell any one, I take an oath that I will never touch Maria again. And Please cool down first . Go have a drink of cold water....
Hafsa: “ O.K. I have to go pee also...
AYA 66.1 AND 66.2 REVEALED
Hafsa returned after a short while and found her husband again in bed with Maria.
Hafsa: “Rasulullah, You have a short memory. You had just said you will not touch her again”.
Prophet: “Yes I did, but Allah revealed aya 66.1 after you left, it says “Mohammed why do you forbid yourself what Allah has made lawful to you just to please your wife”
Hafsa: “What about the oath you took.”
Prophet:: “Allah dissolved my oath” by aya 66.2 which says Allah has ordained for you the dissolution of your oath. And Allah is your Maula”.
ALLAH SPIED FOR THE PROPHET
Next morning when Prophet returned from Fajr prayer, his wives gave him dirty looks and a silent treatment instead of happily greeting him like every day... As smart as our prophet was, he knew right away that Hafsa, had ratted and had divulged last night’s incident to all other wives who incidentally hated Maria for her beauty and prophet’s fondness for her.. Prophet was pissed off and rushed into Hafsa’s room: “When I told you to keep last night’s incident with Maria a secret to yourself, I trusted you; why did you spread it”? .
Hafsa: “Who informed you that I spread it”?
Prophet : “Allah informed* me”:
* 66.3 “The prophet had trusted one of his wives with a certain incident, then she spread it, and GOD let him know about it. He then told his wife,she asked him, "Who informed you of this?" He said, "I was informed by Allah”.
Hafsa started trembling with fear. She had no idea Allah spied for the prophet and tattletaled to him his wives private talks and gossips.
MISBEHAVING WIVES WILL BURN IN HELL FIRE
Angry Prophet then gathered all his resentful wives and conveyed the following chilling message from Allah to them which had just arrived.
66.5 “If Mohammed divorced you all, Allah will give him in exchange wives better than you who are submissive and devout”.
That message was a death sentence to the scared wives. A divorce meant starving to death since no body was allowed to marry Prophet’s wife according to an earlier aya...
Prophet continued:
66.10,11 “ On one hand wives of Allah’s prophets Noah and Lut misbehaved with their husbands and they were put in hell fire. On the other hand wife of the kafir Pharoah was well behaved and she was awarded paradise”..
ONE MONTH BREAK EXCLUSIVELY WITH MARIA
All the wives started wailing. Starving to death was one thing ; burning in hellfire for ever was something else.They grabbed his feet and begged him for mercy. The merciful prophet then took pity on them and decided to apply abstention clause of aya 4.34 (abstaining from sex with wives as a disciplinary action ) He could have divorced them like Allah suggested or beaten them under scouging clause of aya 4.34 .
(Here are the specifications for wife beating for our momin brothers who practice it or intend to practice it):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp3Eam5FX58&eurl=http://sheikyermami.com/2007/03/page/5/
He stayed away from all his wives for a month* and slept exclusively with Maria to humiliate them further and make them jealous .
* Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 43, Number 648:
“The Prophet did not go to his wives because of the secret which Hafsa had disclosed to 'Aisha, and he said that he would not go to his wives for one month as he was angry with them when Allah admonished him for his oath that he would not approach Maria”.
Allah also decided to pitch-in in the misery of Prophet"s wives by making Maria pregnant with a baby boy ( Ibrahim), something Mo desired most and which could not be delivered by any of the nine resident wives.
** Note: Several embarrassed sahabis made false hadiths later about this sura to protect good name of Mohammed. They fabricated the story and said it was honey and not Maria which prophet took an oath to abstain from . That is ridiculous and does not make any sense. Here is what Ibn Saad wrote in “Tabaqat”
“Waqidi has informed us that Abu Bakr has narrated that the messenger of Allah (PBUH) had sexual intercourse with Maria in the house of Hafsa.. She told the prophet, O Messenger of Allah, do you do this in my house and during my turn? The messenger said, control yourself and let me go because I make her haram to me. Hafsa said, I do not accept, unless you swear for me. That Hazrat (his holiness) said, by Allah I will not contact her again [Tabaqat v. 8 p. 223 Publisher Entesharat-e Farhang va Andisheh Tehran 1382 solar h ( 2003) Translator Dr. Mohammad Mahdavi Damghani]
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
LIVE PUBLIC DEBATING, ADVANCED TECHNIQUES
LIVE PUBLIC DEBATING, ADVANCED TECHNIQUES
Most important advice to all muslim brothers and sisters is never to accept a written debate with infidels. It is suicidal. Our Prophet and islam , both will be humiliated badly . Always go for a public debate in front of a live audience. The biggest advantage is that if you cannot dazzle them with brilliance you can baffle them with bullshit Take the example from Imam zakir Naik.
(Besides, the real dangerous ones , the ex-muslims will never dare to come in the open for they know they will be dead meat Less dangerous ones who come in the open will be very careful of what they say for the fear of their lives. Our mujahids are always ready to kill apostates)
AYA 9.5 (AND OTHER VIOLENT SIMILAR AYAS) , THE WEAPONS OF INFIDELS
The biggest weapon of infidels is the aya 9.5 which basically says “convert or get beheaded”. Following illustration is aya 9.5 in a nutshell.
http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/beleive_or_else.jpg
However in a live debate in front of an audience you have to present this lion of an aya disguised as a pussy cat. There are two ways to do it. One is to say the violent ayas are only applicable in defensive wars when attacked by infidels. Other way is to say these ayas are conditional, and then connect them with abrogated defensive fighting ayas of earlier Madina days for applicable conditions. It works wonders with P.C. westerners..
(If they ask about all the countries from Spain to India muslims captured for booty and women, insist those wars were conducted to free oppressed people from their Hitler like brutal rulers, same way US freed so many countries from Hitler)
9.29 THE AYA OF JIZYA
Tell them that this aya was the most misunderstood aya by Mohammed’s followers like Umar and that Mohammed neither meant it nor collected a penny from non muslims . Only one time he suggested to the oppressed christian population of neighbouring Tabuk that if they paid money and financed a jihadi attack on their land, muslims will free them from their tyrant king Heracluis.
(You don’t have to tell them Mohammed implemented first jizya of Islam , 50%. of the crops, on Khaybar jews after capturing their lands, killing many of their men and enslaving most of their women. Niether have you to tell them that Mohammed screwed 17 year old lovely Safia , the wife of tortured and beheaded chief Kinanaa , the same night while the corpses of her husband and family members were lying outside his tent and Mohammed's clothes were still wet with the blood of her father and husband)
MASSACRE OF 900 QURAIZA MEN AND RAPE OF THEIR WOMEN
This is another hairy incident infidels love to rub on your face. Tell them our prophet was helpless in this matter. It was the decision of his foot soldier Saad Bin Muad, and that too was not his fault either , he just read it out from Jewish bible . Then go for the kill and blame the whole Quraiza massacre on bible.
(They don’t have to know that Saad was an illiterate ex-pagan who had no clue what was in the Hebrew jewish bible nor the fact that Mohammed had loved his verdict and declared that Allah had approved of it. Also you don’t have to tell them that Mohammed got 20 % of booty that came to 200+ women plus land and cattle nor the fact that Mohammed .enjoyed all night sex with captured teenage beauty Rehana, the wife of the beheaded Quraiza chief after the massacre)
MISTREATMENT AND OPPRESSION OF NON MUSLIMS IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES
This is also a very popular topic filthy kuffars bring out. When they ask why is there no religious freedom in muslim countries like they have in our country and why muslims kill innocent non muslims, say what muslims do does not represent islam. What is in Quran is Islam and Quran says “there is no compulsion in religion”(2.256) and “killing one innocent is like killing all humanity” (5.32).
(But do not tell them that “there is no compulsion in religion “ was revealed in totally different context and in islam innocents are only muslims, nonmuslims can never be innocents, they are guilty without pardon and condemned to hell for denying islam)
USE OF THE ABOVE TECHNIQUES BY IMAM NADIR AHMED TO DEFEAT AN INFIDEL
Here is a video of Imam Nadir Ahmed (three parts) using above techniques masterfully to embarass and defeat a christian kafir. Jazakallah Khair.
Most important advice to all muslim brothers and sisters is never to accept a written debate with infidels. It is suicidal. Our Prophet and islam , both will be humiliated badly . Always go for a public debate in front of a live audience. The biggest advantage is that if you cannot dazzle them with brilliance you can baffle them with bullshit Take the example from Imam zakir Naik.
(Besides, the real dangerous ones , the ex-muslims will never dare to come in the open for they know they will be dead meat Less dangerous ones who come in the open will be very careful of what they say for the fear of their lives. Our mujahids are always ready to kill apostates)
AYA 9.5 (AND OTHER VIOLENT SIMILAR AYAS) , THE WEAPONS OF INFIDELS
The biggest weapon of infidels is the aya 9.5 which basically says “convert or get beheaded”. Following illustration is aya 9.5 in a nutshell.
http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/beleive_or_else.jpg
However in a live debate in front of an audience you have to present this lion of an aya disguised as a pussy cat. There are two ways to do it. One is to say the violent ayas are only applicable in defensive wars when attacked by infidels. Other way is to say these ayas are conditional, and then connect them with abrogated defensive fighting ayas of earlier Madina days for applicable conditions. It works wonders with P.C. westerners..
(If they ask about all the countries from Spain to India muslims captured for booty and women, insist those wars were conducted to free oppressed people from their Hitler like brutal rulers, same way US freed so many countries from Hitler)
9.29 THE AYA OF JIZYA
Tell them that this aya was the most misunderstood aya by Mohammed’s followers like Umar and that Mohammed neither meant it nor collected a penny from non muslims . Only one time he suggested to the oppressed christian population of neighbouring Tabuk that if they paid money and financed a jihadi attack on their land, muslims will free them from their tyrant king Heracluis.
(You don’t have to tell them Mohammed implemented first jizya of Islam , 50%. of the crops, on Khaybar jews after capturing their lands, killing many of their men and enslaving most of their women. Niether have you to tell them that Mohammed screwed 17 year old lovely Safia , the wife of tortured and beheaded chief Kinanaa , the same night while the corpses of her husband and family members were lying outside his tent and Mohammed's clothes were still wet with the blood of her father and husband)
MASSACRE OF 900 QURAIZA MEN AND RAPE OF THEIR WOMEN
This is another hairy incident infidels love to rub on your face. Tell them our prophet was helpless in this matter. It was the decision of his foot soldier Saad Bin Muad, and that too was not his fault either , he just read it out from Jewish bible . Then go for the kill and blame the whole Quraiza massacre on bible.
(They don’t have to know that Saad was an illiterate ex-pagan who had no clue what was in the Hebrew jewish bible nor the fact that Mohammed had loved his verdict and declared that Allah had approved of it. Also you don’t have to tell them that Mohammed got 20 % of booty that came to 200+ women plus land and cattle nor the fact that Mohammed .enjoyed all night sex with captured teenage beauty Rehana, the wife of the beheaded Quraiza chief after the massacre)
MISTREATMENT AND OPPRESSION OF NON MUSLIMS IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES
This is also a very popular topic filthy kuffars bring out. When they ask why is there no religious freedom in muslim countries like they have in our country and why muslims kill innocent non muslims, say what muslims do does not represent islam. What is in Quran is Islam and Quran says “there is no compulsion in religion”(2.256) and “killing one innocent is like killing all humanity” (5.32).
(But do not tell them that “there is no compulsion in religion “ was revealed in totally different context and in islam innocents are only muslims, nonmuslims can never be innocents, they are guilty without pardon and condemned to hell for denying islam)
USE OF THE ABOVE TECHNIQUES BY IMAM NADIR AHMED TO DEFEAT AN INFIDEL
Here is a video of Imam Nadir Ahmed (three parts) using above techniques masterfully to embarass and defeat a christian kafir. Jazakallah Khair.
CAIR SAYS WOMEN ARE EMPOWERED IN ISLAM
CAIR SAYS WOMEN ARE EMPOWERED IN ISLAM
Here is what CAIR writes:
Misconception:: Muslim women are oppressed and forced to wear the hijab.
CAIR’S Taqiyya: Women often see it as empowering because they are not viewed as sexual objects but judged by their character (in islam).
TRUTH:
WOMEN ARE LIKE DOMESTICATED ANIMALS IN ISLAM
TRUTH: How can women consider themselves empowered when Quran allows them to be whipped by men (4.34), asks them to share their husbands with three other women(4.3) allows men to divorce them by saying “Talaq” three times and replacing them without any reason or rhyme (4.20), allows sex with slave girls abd captured women, (4.3,23.6, 33.50,70.30) , allows temporary marriage(4.24), says two women are equal to one man as witnesses in court, requires women to prove their rape by asking for four male witnesses .
ISLAM ALLOWS MARRIAGE AND SEX WITH A DAY OLD GIRL
Most shameful of the ways woman is looked at by islam is that men are allowed to marry and have sex with a day old girl according to aya 65.4.
Here is video about a Saudi website based on that aya which says muslim men can marry and have sex with one day old Girls . A critic debates with a muslim man who is defending this practice permitted by quran..
(Scroll down video column and click on “Sex with one day old baby girl in islam is O.K.” )
http://www.investigateislam.com/english/index.php?option=com_seyret&Itemid=103
WOMEN LEADERS
CAIR brags islamic countries Bangladesh, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Turkey had female heads of state,implying that men and women are equal in Islam.Those counries having elected women leaders had nothing to do with islam.They were run under western democracy, not under Islamic sharia laws of Quran and hadiths . Taliban ran their country under sharia they didnt even allow a woman to be a dog catcher leave alone to be a head of state. Didn’t CAIR see unemployed women professors begging on streets in Burqas to support their children under true islam. Now that sharia is encroaching in Pakistan see what became of an aspiring Benazir Bhutto . Islamists suicide bombers attacked her twice succeeding second time and taking over 200 pious muslims men along with them to the 72 virgins.
CAIR SAYS ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE
Here is what CAIR writes:
Misconception: Islam promotes violence and terrorism
CAIR’s taqiyya: Council on American-Islamic Relations, prominent Muslims, Islamic organizations and Islamic scholars have repeatedly denounced the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 and terrorism in general. Jihad is a term that is often misunderstood and associated with violent radical militants.
TRUTH
ISLAM PROMOTES VIOLENCE, DISCRIMINATION, HATRED DEATH AND DESTRUCTION
Who gives a rat’s behind what CAIR or the Islamic scholars in the
west say to fool the infidels.. What does quran say and what did Prophet Mohammed do in his life is what determines whether islam promotes violence and terrorism or not. Bin Laden and AlQueda follows quran and sunna, they don’t give two hoots what t Fiqh council of USA or CAIR thinks.
WHAT QURAN SAYS
Quran’s final verdict:
aya 9.5 says it all :” Slay the infidels wherever ye shall find them; and seize them,
besiege them, and lay wait for them with every kind of ambush.
Quran has 164 ayas promoting violence and terrorism to go along with above very popular aya of the sword.
http://islamreview.com/articles/jihadholywarversesinthekoran.shtml
WHAT PROPHET SAID
Bukhari:V4B52N220
"Allah's Apostle said, 'I have been made victorious with terror.'"
WHAT PROPHET DID.
Here is a typical day in Prophet Mohammed’s life who earned his livelihood (and women) through robbery and raids:
Bukhari ,Volume 3, Book 46, Number 717:
Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day.
Here is what CAIR writes:
Misconception:: Muslim women are oppressed and forced to wear the hijab.
CAIR’S Taqiyya: Women often see it as empowering because they are not viewed as sexual objects but judged by their character (in islam).
TRUTH:
WOMEN ARE LIKE DOMESTICATED ANIMALS IN ISLAM
TRUTH: How can women consider themselves empowered when Quran allows them to be whipped by men (4.34), asks them to share their husbands with three other women(4.3) allows men to divorce them by saying “Talaq” three times and replacing them without any reason or rhyme (4.20), allows sex with slave girls abd captured women, (4.3,23.6, 33.50,70.30) , allows temporary marriage(4.24), says two women are equal to one man as witnesses in court, requires women to prove their rape by asking for four male witnesses .
ISLAM ALLOWS MARRIAGE AND SEX WITH A DAY OLD GIRL
Most shameful of the ways woman is looked at by islam is that men are allowed to marry and have sex with a day old girl according to aya 65.4.
Here is video about a Saudi website based on that aya which says muslim men can marry and have sex with one day old Girls . A critic debates with a muslim man who is defending this practice permitted by quran..
(Scroll down video column and click on “Sex with one day old baby girl in islam is O.K.” )
http://www.investigateislam.com/english/index.php?option=com_seyret&Itemid=103
WOMEN LEADERS
CAIR brags islamic countries Bangladesh, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Turkey had female heads of state,implying that men and women are equal in Islam.Those counries having elected women leaders had nothing to do with islam.They were run under western democracy, not under Islamic sharia laws of Quran and hadiths . Taliban ran their country under sharia they didnt even allow a woman to be a dog catcher leave alone to be a head of state. Didn’t CAIR see unemployed women professors begging on streets in Burqas to support their children under true islam. Now that sharia is encroaching in Pakistan see what became of an aspiring Benazir Bhutto . Islamists suicide bombers attacked her twice succeeding second time and taking over 200 pious muslims men along with them to the 72 virgins.
CAIR SAYS ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE
Here is what CAIR writes:
Misconception: Islam promotes violence and terrorism
CAIR’s taqiyya: Council on American-Islamic Relations, prominent Muslims, Islamic organizations and Islamic scholars have repeatedly denounced the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 and terrorism in general. Jihad is a term that is often misunderstood and associated with violent radical militants.
TRUTH
ISLAM PROMOTES VIOLENCE, DISCRIMINATION, HATRED DEATH AND DESTRUCTION
Who gives a rat’s behind what CAIR or the Islamic scholars in the
west say to fool the infidels.. What does quran say and what did Prophet Mohammed do in his life is what determines whether islam promotes violence and terrorism or not. Bin Laden and AlQueda follows quran and sunna, they don’t give two hoots what t Fiqh council of USA or CAIR thinks.
WHAT QURAN SAYS
Quran’s final verdict:
aya 9.5 says it all :” Slay the infidels wherever ye shall find them; and seize them,
besiege them, and lay wait for them with every kind of ambush.
Quran has 164 ayas promoting violence and terrorism to go along with above very popular aya of the sword.
http://islamreview.com/articles/jihadholywarversesinthekoran.shtml
WHAT PROPHET SAID
Bukhari:V4B52N220
"Allah's Apostle said, 'I have been made victorious with terror.'"
WHAT PROPHET DID.
Here is a typical day in Prophet Mohammed’s life who earned his livelihood (and women) through robbery and raids:
Bukhari ,Volume 3, Book 46, Number 717:
Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day.
At War With Islam
At War With Islam
Martel Sobieskey
America is at war with the religion of Islam. The key word here is religion. We American’s have a “mental block” that causes us to deny that we are fighting a religion. Take an atomic bomb write the letters R-E-L-I-G-I-O-N on it and we, gullible Americans, will welcome it as a religion. This statement is not entirely an exaggeration. Freedom of religion has become America’s “Achilles heel” stabbed through with the sword of Islam. From where does this “suicidal” freedom of religion “mental block” originate? It comes from our “knee jerk” compulsion to blindly believe that all prophets are extreme pacifists like Jesus. This blindness plagues the highest levels of our leadership, intelligence and academic communities. It is a national security disaster making it nearly impossible to protect ourselves. The killers are shouting Allah Akbar worldwide and carrying the Koran, yet we Americans refuse to identify Islam as the enemy.
Let’s call it America’s “freedom of religion ostrich syndrome”. Our enemies “love it” because they can destroy us by hiding under the cover of a religion. They blow us up, vilify us, file lawsuits, teach anti-American Jihad in their mosques and schools, while we Americans assume the fetal position because it’s committed by a religion. Even the FBI has been promoting Islamic sensitivity training, this tells it all. Does not such servile behavior prove that we have lost the ideological war, mental war, psychological war, war of ideas, war of words, and the propaganda war? Please heed my prediction: Every time someone calls Islam the religion of Peace, America is one step closer to defeat and Islam one step closer to victory in this clash of religions.
Fellow Americans this is a clash of religions, and you must stop denying that we are fighting the religion of Islam. Basically the war is Islam versus all other religions worldwide as required by the Koran. Since there are 1 billion Muslims and 5.5 billion infidels, this war will be easy to win if we “get with it” and clearly identify the enemy and “shout it from the roof tops”. Why don’t Americans do so? The shameful disgrace is that Islamic oil money has silenced if not “bought” America over the past 30 years. Steven Emerson’s book, “Jihad Incorporated” shockingly reveals the extent of Jihadist infiltration into America. He states, “Open societies are inherently and necessarily at a disadvantage in providing a secure environment.” Likewise middle east expert Dr. Walid Phares of FDD (Foundation for Defense of Democracies) and author of “Future Jihad” states:
“I have seen firsthand how Jihadist ideologies have systematically penetrated the United States . . . This web of ideological penetration is the most dangerous long-term threat to U.S. national security . . . The reasoning is rational: Once you control the mind, the body will follow.”
I agree with both Steven Emerson and Dr. Phares. The Jidaists and traitors within are controlling the mind of America; there is no greater proof of this than our collective compulsion which forces us to call Islam the Religion of Peace which in turn prevents us from designating Islam as the enemy.
In a similar perspective, Dr. William Gawthrop, (former manager of the defense department’s Counter Intelligence Field Activity-CIFA), explains it is a taboo to mention that Islamic violence has anything to do with the religion of Islam. Specifically he states:
“Officials must first overcome the political taboo of linking Islamic violence to the religion of Islam, its sacred scripture, and the personal example of its revered prophet.”
In other words, this taboo requires one and all to blindly proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace, which is equivalent to saying that Mohammed was an extreme pacifist, just like Jesus. What a crying shame that our leaders and experts have become so intellectually dishonest and weak minded. Today’s Muslims, like Muslims of all time, emulate Mohammed not Jesus.
The problem is MOHAMMED WAS NOT A PACIFIST. Mohammed was a military tyrant who fought “hands on” in several blood thirsty raids, and mercilessly killed nearly all those who disagreed with him. It is a concrete historical fact that over a 10 year period, called the Hijra (622-632), Mohammed conducted 84 murderous raids proving he is the exact opposite of a peaceful prophet. Author Dr. Gregory Davis in “The Religion of Peace?” provides excellent insight into Islamic aggression.
Despite obvious facts, we Americans respond pathetically and irrationally; like naïve children we think, “How can this be? Jesus is a prophet and he was never violent, and since Mohammed is also a prophet he likewise must never have been violent”. Wake up America, Mohammed and Jesus were polar opposites. Don’t take my word on it. Please read, the 800 page biography of Mohammed (Sirat Rasul Allah) written by Ibn Ishag and translated by A. Guillaumne, it incontrovertibly proves that Mohammed was a military tyrant bent upon bloodthirsty worldwide imperialistic Jihad.
To know and understand ones enemy and to clearly identify the enemy is the primary dictum of warfare. Our leaders and experts have failed in their duty to identify the enemy. They keep calling the enemy “terrorism”. Terrorism is not the enemy. The enemy is Islam. Islam uses terrorism (guerilla warfare) as a method (tactic) to attack us. The enemy is the “entity” implementing the method of terrorism. For example, if someone is throwing rotten eggs at you, it is not the “rotten eggs” but rather the “person” throwing them who is the enemy.
It is an outrage, that the majority of our leaders and experts think like overly genteel and sissified school boys who are too spineless if not politically cowardly (P.C.) to call anyone an enemy -- no matter how blatantly obvious it is. For example, take Dr. Angel Rabasa and his colleagues of the highly acclaimed Rand Corporation, he states: “In the Global War on Terrorism, the United States is confronting a very different type of enemy: shadowy non-state actors that are not subject to traditional means of deterrence. . . It is unclear what targets, if any, the United States could hold at risk to deter attack.”
Wrong! Once again, the enemy is not terrorism. Rabasa proves his ineptness by stating the “Global War on Terrorism” meaning he cannot distinguish between a rotten egg and the person who has thrown it.
By refusing to identify the enemy as Islam, Angel Rabasa and Rand Corporation, have thereby swallowed the bait of Islamic deception by promoting a strategy called, “Building Moderate Muslim Networks”. This means they have unwittingly become Jihadist propagandists promoting Islam’s primary method for defeating us which is: the infiltrations and deceptions utilized by moderate Muslims. Sure, moderate Muslims are not suicide bombers, but they have accomplished even greater damage by manipulating our overly liberal laws and naiveté. This is why it is so terribly wrong to call terrorism the enemy, because doing so completely ignores the damage being committed by Islam’s peaceful invaders the so called moderate Muslims.
I do not mean to pick on Rabasa alone. Permit me to give the following two criteria for determining an expert’s competence: First: Anyone who calls the enemy terrorism rather than the religion of Islam is incompetent and should be fired from his job. Second: Anyone who calls Islam a Religion of peace is incompetent or an outright enemy propagandist or badly informed regarding Islamic religious conditioning.
Why have our leaders and experts become so blind? They are afflicted with the Oslo Syndrome meaning they are pathologically unable to evaluate the crimes committed by Islam to the extent they are going to get us all killed. Dr. Kenneth Levin in his book the “The Oslo Syndrome” explains that those afflicted with the syndrome live in absolute denial of the blatant fraud and egregious dishonesty that Muslims employ by making counterfeit peace agreements. For many, such relentless mockery proves that diplomacy has failed long ago and war is the necessary solution.
Everyone should read chapters 12 thru 16 of Dr. Levin’s book. The pervasively masochistic behavior documented within proves that our leaders and experts have been leading us into defeat. The Oslo syndrome has now morphed into the Annapolis syndrome. Here we go round and round again!
Truly, we need face the fact that moderate Muslims are more difficult to find than “a needle in the haystack”. We are at war and the brutal realties must not be soft peddled. Please consider the following distinction: The militant Muslim is the person cutting the head off the infidel while the moderate Muslim holds the victims feet. During 9/11 the trade towers were the “head” cut off by the militants, while the moderate Mosque community “held the victim’s feet”. Please reflect deeply on this analogy. History proves that both militant and moderate Muslims are invaders working as a team to conqueror America. This is clearly articulated by Abdullah-Al-Araby in his book “The Islamization of America.”
Please mark my words, calling Islam a religion of peace is patently dishonest and the worst ideological mistake in American history. It truly is our “Achilles heel” as before mention. No wonder Dr. Paul Williams states in his book “The Dunces of Doomsday”: “The Day after 9/11, President Bush promulgated the granddaddy of all whoppers by saying, “Islam is a religion of Peace.”
I have great respect for President Bush and support him wholeheartedly because he is the first President having the guts to fight the Islamists since President Thomas Jefferson sent our Navy to Tripoli in 1803. The problem is President Bush has invalidated his own war efforts by this ideological error, that is, his administration’s obsession for calling Islam a Religion of Peace. The truth must be told: Islam is a Religion of War and the evidence proving this fact is piled a mile high right up to 9/11. A website site sarcastically named www.thereligionofpeace.com lists the thousands of Islamic murders and atrocities committed worldwide.
In conclusion, permit me to make this prediction: The war cannot be won unless we clearly identify the enemy as Islam, and the American government makes a formal declaration of war against the Religion of Islam. That’s right; this will be a new thing for Americans who wrongly believe that all religions are benign!
In numerous places worldwide the murderers are shouting Allah Akbar and carrying the Koran, yet we Americans fool heartedly provide unrestricted freedom of religion to Islam - oblivious to the carnage. This oblivion was the root cause of 9/11 and has sent us spinning headlong toward a nuclear Islamic terrorist attack on American soil which the Islamo-fascists have been bragging about for nearly 10 years.
Martel Sobieskey has 35 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, security personnel and police have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched Jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam, moderates included.
Martel Sobieskey
America is at war with the religion of Islam. The key word here is religion. We American’s have a “mental block” that causes us to deny that we are fighting a religion. Take an atomic bomb write the letters R-E-L-I-G-I-O-N on it and we, gullible Americans, will welcome it as a religion. This statement is not entirely an exaggeration. Freedom of religion has become America’s “Achilles heel” stabbed through with the sword of Islam. From where does this “suicidal” freedom of religion “mental block” originate? It comes from our “knee jerk” compulsion to blindly believe that all prophets are extreme pacifists like Jesus. This blindness plagues the highest levels of our leadership, intelligence and academic communities. It is a national security disaster making it nearly impossible to protect ourselves. The killers are shouting Allah Akbar worldwide and carrying the Koran, yet we Americans refuse to identify Islam as the enemy.
Let’s call it America’s “freedom of religion ostrich syndrome”. Our enemies “love it” because they can destroy us by hiding under the cover of a religion. They blow us up, vilify us, file lawsuits, teach anti-American Jihad in their mosques and schools, while we Americans assume the fetal position because it’s committed by a religion. Even the FBI has been promoting Islamic sensitivity training, this tells it all. Does not such servile behavior prove that we have lost the ideological war, mental war, psychological war, war of ideas, war of words, and the propaganda war? Please heed my prediction: Every time someone calls Islam the religion of Peace, America is one step closer to defeat and Islam one step closer to victory in this clash of religions.
Fellow Americans this is a clash of religions, and you must stop denying that we are fighting the religion of Islam. Basically the war is Islam versus all other religions worldwide as required by the Koran. Since there are 1 billion Muslims and 5.5 billion infidels, this war will be easy to win if we “get with it” and clearly identify the enemy and “shout it from the roof tops”. Why don’t Americans do so? The shameful disgrace is that Islamic oil money has silenced if not “bought” America over the past 30 years. Steven Emerson’s book, “Jihad Incorporated” shockingly reveals the extent of Jihadist infiltration into America. He states, “Open societies are inherently and necessarily at a disadvantage in providing a secure environment.” Likewise middle east expert Dr. Walid Phares of FDD (Foundation for Defense of Democracies) and author of “Future Jihad” states:
“I have seen firsthand how Jihadist ideologies have systematically penetrated the United States . . . This web of ideological penetration is the most dangerous long-term threat to U.S. national security . . . The reasoning is rational: Once you control the mind, the body will follow.”
I agree with both Steven Emerson and Dr. Phares. The Jidaists and traitors within are controlling the mind of America; there is no greater proof of this than our collective compulsion which forces us to call Islam the Religion of Peace which in turn prevents us from designating Islam as the enemy.
In a similar perspective, Dr. William Gawthrop, (former manager of the defense department’s Counter Intelligence Field Activity-CIFA), explains it is a taboo to mention that Islamic violence has anything to do with the religion of Islam. Specifically he states:
“Officials must first overcome the political taboo of linking Islamic violence to the religion of Islam, its sacred scripture, and the personal example of its revered prophet.”
In other words, this taboo requires one and all to blindly proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace, which is equivalent to saying that Mohammed was an extreme pacifist, just like Jesus. What a crying shame that our leaders and experts have become so intellectually dishonest and weak minded. Today’s Muslims, like Muslims of all time, emulate Mohammed not Jesus.
The problem is MOHAMMED WAS NOT A PACIFIST. Mohammed was a military tyrant who fought “hands on” in several blood thirsty raids, and mercilessly killed nearly all those who disagreed with him. It is a concrete historical fact that over a 10 year period, called the Hijra (622-632), Mohammed conducted 84 murderous raids proving he is the exact opposite of a peaceful prophet. Author Dr. Gregory Davis in “The Religion of Peace?” provides excellent insight into Islamic aggression.
Despite obvious facts, we Americans respond pathetically and irrationally; like naïve children we think, “How can this be? Jesus is a prophet and he was never violent, and since Mohammed is also a prophet he likewise must never have been violent”. Wake up America, Mohammed and Jesus were polar opposites. Don’t take my word on it. Please read, the 800 page biography of Mohammed (Sirat Rasul Allah) written by Ibn Ishag and translated by A. Guillaumne, it incontrovertibly proves that Mohammed was a military tyrant bent upon bloodthirsty worldwide imperialistic Jihad.
To know and understand ones enemy and to clearly identify the enemy is the primary dictum of warfare. Our leaders and experts have failed in their duty to identify the enemy. They keep calling the enemy “terrorism”. Terrorism is not the enemy. The enemy is Islam. Islam uses terrorism (guerilla warfare) as a method (tactic) to attack us. The enemy is the “entity” implementing the method of terrorism. For example, if someone is throwing rotten eggs at you, it is not the “rotten eggs” but rather the “person” throwing them who is the enemy.
It is an outrage, that the majority of our leaders and experts think like overly genteel and sissified school boys who are too spineless if not politically cowardly (P.C.) to call anyone an enemy -- no matter how blatantly obvious it is. For example, take Dr. Angel Rabasa and his colleagues of the highly acclaimed Rand Corporation, he states: “In the Global War on Terrorism, the United States is confronting a very different type of enemy: shadowy non-state actors that are not subject to traditional means of deterrence. . . It is unclear what targets, if any, the United States could hold at risk to deter attack.”
Wrong! Once again, the enemy is not terrorism. Rabasa proves his ineptness by stating the “Global War on Terrorism” meaning he cannot distinguish between a rotten egg and the person who has thrown it.
By refusing to identify the enemy as Islam, Angel Rabasa and Rand Corporation, have thereby swallowed the bait of Islamic deception by promoting a strategy called, “Building Moderate Muslim Networks”. This means they have unwittingly become Jihadist propagandists promoting Islam’s primary method for defeating us which is: the infiltrations and deceptions utilized by moderate Muslims. Sure, moderate Muslims are not suicide bombers, but they have accomplished even greater damage by manipulating our overly liberal laws and naiveté. This is why it is so terribly wrong to call terrorism the enemy, because doing so completely ignores the damage being committed by Islam’s peaceful invaders the so called moderate Muslims.
I do not mean to pick on Rabasa alone. Permit me to give the following two criteria for determining an expert’s competence: First: Anyone who calls the enemy terrorism rather than the religion of Islam is incompetent and should be fired from his job. Second: Anyone who calls Islam a Religion of peace is incompetent or an outright enemy propagandist or badly informed regarding Islamic religious conditioning.
Why have our leaders and experts become so blind? They are afflicted with the Oslo Syndrome meaning they are pathologically unable to evaluate the crimes committed by Islam to the extent they are going to get us all killed. Dr. Kenneth Levin in his book the “The Oslo Syndrome” explains that those afflicted with the syndrome live in absolute denial of the blatant fraud and egregious dishonesty that Muslims employ by making counterfeit peace agreements. For many, such relentless mockery proves that diplomacy has failed long ago and war is the necessary solution.
Everyone should read chapters 12 thru 16 of Dr. Levin’s book. The pervasively masochistic behavior documented within proves that our leaders and experts have been leading us into defeat. The Oslo syndrome has now morphed into the Annapolis syndrome. Here we go round and round again!
Truly, we need face the fact that moderate Muslims are more difficult to find than “a needle in the haystack”. We are at war and the brutal realties must not be soft peddled. Please consider the following distinction: The militant Muslim is the person cutting the head off the infidel while the moderate Muslim holds the victims feet. During 9/11 the trade towers were the “head” cut off by the militants, while the moderate Mosque community “held the victim’s feet”. Please reflect deeply on this analogy. History proves that both militant and moderate Muslims are invaders working as a team to conqueror America. This is clearly articulated by Abdullah-Al-Araby in his book “The Islamization of America.”
Please mark my words, calling Islam a religion of peace is patently dishonest and the worst ideological mistake in American history. It truly is our “Achilles heel” as before mention. No wonder Dr. Paul Williams states in his book “The Dunces of Doomsday”: “The Day after 9/11, President Bush promulgated the granddaddy of all whoppers by saying, “Islam is a religion of Peace.”
I have great respect for President Bush and support him wholeheartedly because he is the first President having the guts to fight the Islamists since President Thomas Jefferson sent our Navy to Tripoli in 1803. The problem is President Bush has invalidated his own war efforts by this ideological error, that is, his administration’s obsession for calling Islam a Religion of Peace. The truth must be told: Islam is a Religion of War and the evidence proving this fact is piled a mile high right up to 9/11. A website site sarcastically named www.thereligionofpeace.com lists the thousands of Islamic murders and atrocities committed worldwide.
In conclusion, permit me to make this prediction: The war cannot be won unless we clearly identify the enemy as Islam, and the American government makes a formal declaration of war against the Religion of Islam. That’s right; this will be a new thing for Americans who wrongly believe that all religions are benign!
In numerous places worldwide the murderers are shouting Allah Akbar and carrying the Koran, yet we Americans fool heartedly provide unrestricted freedom of religion to Islam - oblivious to the carnage. This oblivion was the root cause of 9/11 and has sent us spinning headlong toward a nuclear Islamic terrorist attack on American soil which the Islamo-fascists have been bragging about for nearly 10 years.
Martel Sobieskey has 35 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, security personnel and police have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched Jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam, moderates included.
Mohammed and Zeinab Higazy
Mohammed and Zeinab Higazy
The latest victims of "balances" in the Egyptian society
By Mounir Bishay- Los Angeles
Twenty five year old Mohammed Ahmed Higazi (L), and his pregnant wife Zeinab, 23, read from the bible August 2 in their home in a Cairo. Higazi who converted from Islam to Christianity has launched a bid to have the change recognized officially in what is believed to be the first such case, he told AFP today. In Egypt, identity cards say whether the bearer is Christian or Muslim, but those who convert to Christianity complain that administrative hurdles prevent them being able to change their official papers
Mohammed Higazy (25), an Egyptian young man who was born a Muslim but converted to Christianity at age 16 and changed his name to the Christian name Bishoy. Zeinab (23), an Egyptian young woman, was also born a Muslim, converted to Christianity and changed her name to Katerina. The couple are now married and expecting their first child. They made news when Mohammed decided to go to court in Egypt trying to get their conversion officially recognized so that their unborn baby would be born a Christian. The case attracted much attention internationally as well as it has in Egypt. It’s the first time in Egyptian history that a Muslim has dared to do so in Egypt. The Egyptian authorities usually welcome the Christians who seek to convert to Islam but deny the same rights to the Muslims who want to convert to Christianity. Since it is a test case of the Egyptian system, many await eagerly and cautiously the outcome of the case.
Due to the sensitivity of the case, I carefully followed the debates surrounding it in the Egyptian media. I was surprised to see that the general consensus in Egypt is to forbid this young man’s request to change religions. On a personal level, it was said that he is not truthful or genuine about the matter. The claim is he is only seeking media attention in an effort to become famous. From a religious standpoint, it raises the apostasy from Islam issue and the punishment that goes along with it. For the purpose of this article, I am not going to discuss the Islamic religious issue of apostasy. Likewise, I cannot speak of this man’s motives, as I don’t personally know him. Nevertheless, I don’t believe it is my business or anyone else’s to judge what is going on within this man’s conscience. We need to leave such judgment to the man and his creator.
However, there was a specific argument that attracted my attention. It was the assertion that it would somehow undermine the “balances” of society if he were allowed to convert. I was astounded to know that some people would sacrifice undisputable individual rights just because they believe they don’t agree with the changing trends of society. I could not help wondering if some people are making such a sacred cow out of societal values that none dare to touch.
My mind went back and pondered what I had discovered about Egyptian society after being away for almost three decades. It was a completely different society from the one that I had once known. Those who continually live in the Egyptian society may not notice the changes, but they are certainly a shock to those who have been away for any length of time. The contrasts are apparent in most everything. For example, one cannot miss the appearance of religiosity especially in regard to the way that people dress. Most of the women wear Islamic hijabs and many men are growing beards. There are religious overtones in the everyday language of the people. However, a deep look exposes that much of what one sees is only superficial. An astute observer will soon recognize that there are other religious values that could be lacking. Values like chastity, honesty, love, mercy and kindness are not equally demonstrated in the dealings among people. I heard new mottos circulating that indicate that people would accept and do most anything if they feel it will get them ahead. People are racing for making money. And, it seems that no matter how much they accumulate, it’s never enough. Everything is available in the marketplace, but the prices are so outrageous that many things are out of reach for most people. There is however a small wealthy minority who can afford to buy what they want. This creates various degrees of envy and competition, moral or immoral. The Egyptian society is going through drastic changes; religiously, economically, and socially. Such are causing people to rethink the traditional values and to replace them with values foreign to Egyptians.
Do we want that these present and changing values of the Egyptian society to be the foundation that shape our lives and dictate what we accept and what we reject?
In cases such as the one in question, what are we to do? If the society rejects a perfectly legitimate issue that will help preserve individual rights, which side should we take? The side of legitimacy or the side of supporting the unreasonable and flawed dictates of society?
I understand that if security is the main consideration, it is easier to maintain peace when things go the way that the majority within society is most apt to accept. While this might be the easiest way to accomplish peace, is it the moral and right way? Should we sacrifice the rights of people to achieve peace in society? Where then are the security forces that are supposed to protect individuals from immoral and unjust masses?
At this point, some may object on the grounds that the views of society represent the opinion of the majority. They argue; in a democracy, the majority’s opinion rules. They sneer those who call for democracy accusing them of being selective and hypocritical about applying it.
These people misunderstand the true meanings of democracy. Democracy doesn’t mean that one person over the 50%, can do whatever he/she wants in society regardless of the rights of others. If that were the case, the whole foundation of the society would be turned upside down. In addition to the concept that the majority rules; there are other important elements that are part of a democracy that must be considered. For instance, in the United States, the White majority cannot enact a law that would enable them to deport all of the Blacks. Even if the majority did accept such a law, could it become the law of the land? Of course not, for one thing, it would be deemed unconstitutional and would certainly be rejected by America’s Federal court.
The word “balances” of society has been used as a cliché to deny the legitimate rights of many people in Egypt. We have seen it used not only about the right to change religions, but also about a host of other injustices. It has been used in denials for churches to obtain building permits; forbidding Christians to advance to high-ranking jobs; and in the lack of just punishments for Muslims who commit crimes against Christians.
In all these situations the victims are asked to accept injustice because of the “balances” of society. “Balances” of society has become an elastic word that can be applied to almost anything and everything. It is also a word that sounds nice, but has a nasty, wicked and objectionable meaning. It simply means that the majority of people in the Egyptian society no longer accept the minority that differs from them in religion.
The government has choices to make. It can accept the present situation and continue with business as usual. Or, they can pause and ask themselves; why have things in our nation sunk to such a shameful condition? They should be contemplating how to change the society and get it back on the right track.
Great leaders are the courageous ones who swim against the tide. They are able to challenge the status quo and change the direction of their nations for better. They deserve recognition and the honor of being numbered with those who changed history.
It is wrong when the balances of Egyptian society tilt against the legitimate rights of two of its citizens, Mohammed and Zeinab. This is not Egypt that I am proud of. I pray that my Egypt will again become an oasis of hope and security for the weak and the oppressed that seek refuge against tyranny and injustice.
The latest victims of "balances" in the Egyptian society
By Mounir Bishay- Los Angeles
Twenty five year old Mohammed Ahmed Higazi (L), and his pregnant wife Zeinab, 23, read from the bible August 2 in their home in a Cairo. Higazi who converted from Islam to Christianity has launched a bid to have the change recognized officially in what is believed to be the first such case, he told AFP today. In Egypt, identity cards say whether the bearer is Christian or Muslim, but those who convert to Christianity complain that administrative hurdles prevent them being able to change their official papers
Mohammed Higazy (25), an Egyptian young man who was born a Muslim but converted to Christianity at age 16 and changed his name to the Christian name Bishoy. Zeinab (23), an Egyptian young woman, was also born a Muslim, converted to Christianity and changed her name to Katerina. The couple are now married and expecting their first child. They made news when Mohammed decided to go to court in Egypt trying to get their conversion officially recognized so that their unborn baby would be born a Christian. The case attracted much attention internationally as well as it has in Egypt. It’s the first time in Egyptian history that a Muslim has dared to do so in Egypt. The Egyptian authorities usually welcome the Christians who seek to convert to Islam but deny the same rights to the Muslims who want to convert to Christianity. Since it is a test case of the Egyptian system, many await eagerly and cautiously the outcome of the case.
Due to the sensitivity of the case, I carefully followed the debates surrounding it in the Egyptian media. I was surprised to see that the general consensus in Egypt is to forbid this young man’s request to change religions. On a personal level, it was said that he is not truthful or genuine about the matter. The claim is he is only seeking media attention in an effort to become famous. From a religious standpoint, it raises the apostasy from Islam issue and the punishment that goes along with it. For the purpose of this article, I am not going to discuss the Islamic religious issue of apostasy. Likewise, I cannot speak of this man’s motives, as I don’t personally know him. Nevertheless, I don’t believe it is my business or anyone else’s to judge what is going on within this man’s conscience. We need to leave such judgment to the man and his creator.
However, there was a specific argument that attracted my attention. It was the assertion that it would somehow undermine the “balances” of society if he were allowed to convert. I was astounded to know that some people would sacrifice undisputable individual rights just because they believe they don’t agree with the changing trends of society. I could not help wondering if some people are making such a sacred cow out of societal values that none dare to touch.
My mind went back and pondered what I had discovered about Egyptian society after being away for almost three decades. It was a completely different society from the one that I had once known. Those who continually live in the Egyptian society may not notice the changes, but they are certainly a shock to those who have been away for any length of time. The contrasts are apparent in most everything. For example, one cannot miss the appearance of religiosity especially in regard to the way that people dress. Most of the women wear Islamic hijabs and many men are growing beards. There are religious overtones in the everyday language of the people. However, a deep look exposes that much of what one sees is only superficial. An astute observer will soon recognize that there are other religious values that could be lacking. Values like chastity, honesty, love, mercy and kindness are not equally demonstrated in the dealings among people. I heard new mottos circulating that indicate that people would accept and do most anything if they feel it will get them ahead. People are racing for making money. And, it seems that no matter how much they accumulate, it’s never enough. Everything is available in the marketplace, but the prices are so outrageous that many things are out of reach for most people. There is however a small wealthy minority who can afford to buy what they want. This creates various degrees of envy and competition, moral or immoral. The Egyptian society is going through drastic changes; religiously, economically, and socially. Such are causing people to rethink the traditional values and to replace them with values foreign to Egyptians.
Do we want that these present and changing values of the Egyptian society to be the foundation that shape our lives and dictate what we accept and what we reject?
In cases such as the one in question, what are we to do? If the society rejects a perfectly legitimate issue that will help preserve individual rights, which side should we take? The side of legitimacy or the side of supporting the unreasonable and flawed dictates of society?
I understand that if security is the main consideration, it is easier to maintain peace when things go the way that the majority within society is most apt to accept. While this might be the easiest way to accomplish peace, is it the moral and right way? Should we sacrifice the rights of people to achieve peace in society? Where then are the security forces that are supposed to protect individuals from immoral and unjust masses?
At this point, some may object on the grounds that the views of society represent the opinion of the majority. They argue; in a democracy, the majority’s opinion rules. They sneer those who call for democracy accusing them of being selective and hypocritical about applying it.
These people misunderstand the true meanings of democracy. Democracy doesn’t mean that one person over the 50%, can do whatever he/she wants in society regardless of the rights of others. If that were the case, the whole foundation of the society would be turned upside down. In addition to the concept that the majority rules; there are other important elements that are part of a democracy that must be considered. For instance, in the United States, the White majority cannot enact a law that would enable them to deport all of the Blacks. Even if the majority did accept such a law, could it become the law of the land? Of course not, for one thing, it would be deemed unconstitutional and would certainly be rejected by America’s Federal court.
The word “balances” of society has been used as a cliché to deny the legitimate rights of many people in Egypt. We have seen it used not only about the right to change religions, but also about a host of other injustices. It has been used in denials for churches to obtain building permits; forbidding Christians to advance to high-ranking jobs; and in the lack of just punishments for Muslims who commit crimes against Christians.
In all these situations the victims are asked to accept injustice because of the “balances” of society. “Balances” of society has become an elastic word that can be applied to almost anything and everything. It is also a word that sounds nice, but has a nasty, wicked and objectionable meaning. It simply means that the majority of people in the Egyptian society no longer accept the minority that differs from them in religion.
The government has choices to make. It can accept the present situation and continue with business as usual. Or, they can pause and ask themselves; why have things in our nation sunk to such a shameful condition? They should be contemplating how to change the society and get it back on the right track.
Great leaders are the courageous ones who swim against the tide. They are able to challenge the status quo and change the direction of their nations for better. They deserve recognition and the honor of being numbered with those who changed history.
It is wrong when the balances of Egyptian society tilt against the legitimate rights of two of its citizens, Mohammed and Zeinab. This is not Egypt that I am proud of. I pray that my Egypt will again become an oasis of hope and security for the weak and the oppressed that seek refuge against tyranny and injustice.
Islamic Tid Bits
Islamic Tid Bits
By Ayesha Ahmed
ISLAMIC PEEPING TOMS
Apostle of God had great taste in women and only selected the ones with good looks and great figure ( later in life, when he had power and choice). Selection and acquiring of Zaynab, his first cousin and his adopted son Zaid’s wife emphasizes this point. Zainab had a beautiful face , but only after seeing her in the nude and liking what he saw, he chose to acquire her.
This is what TABARI says in "History of Tabari" Vol 8:
“One day Muhammad went out looking for Zayd. Now there was a covering of hair cloth over the doorway, but the wind had lifted the covering so that the doorway was uncovered. Zaynab was in her chamber, undressed, and admiration for her entered the heart of the Prophet. After that Allah made her unattractive to Zayd.’”
Almighty ordered their union thru Q 33.37
His 24 /7 sex life was also known in Madina..
Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:
"The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, "Had the Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men)."
He also enjoyed taking baths with his young and beautiful wives.
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0629:
'A'isha reported: I and the Messenger (may peace be upon him) took a bath from the same vessel and our hands alternated into it in the state that we had had sexual intercourse.
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0630:
'A'isha reported: I and the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) took a bath from one vessel which was placed between me and him and he would get ahead of me, so that I would say: Spare (some water for) me, spare (some water for) me; and she said that they had had sexual intercourse.
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0631:
Ibn Abbas said: Maimuna (the wife of the Holy Prophet) reported to me that she and the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) took a bath from one vessel.
All the above factors attracted many peeping Toms to his huts. Many enjoyed the views and action without ever being caught but some did get caught and got bloody eyes.
Bukhari , Volume 9, Book 83, Number 38a:
Narrated Anas:
A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at him to poke him stealthily.
Muslim, Book 025, Number 5369:
Anas b. Malik reported that a person peeped in some of the holes (in the doors) of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)..
Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 83, Number 38:
Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd As-Sa'idi:
A man peeped through a hole in the door of Allah's Apostle's house, and at that time, Allah's Apostle had a Midri (an iron comb or bar) with which he was rubbing his head. So when Allah's Apostle saw him, he said (to him), "If I had been sure that you were looking at me (through the door), I would have poked your eye with this (sharp iron bar)
One such peeping tom, Abu Ayyub Ansari, spent the night peeping into the tent where the 57 year old apostle was spending the night with gorgeous 17 year old Safia, acquired earlier in the day in the Khaibar raid. However Ayyub was smart and talked his way out when he was caught with his pants down. Read on:
According to a muslim wesbite muslimunited.org ( minus the sugar coating)
“Safiyah was captured in the Khaibar raid and was claimed by the apostle as his share of booty.. She was then seventeen. She was groomed and made-up for the Prophet by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik. They spent the night there. In the early dawn, the Prophet suspected some movement near the tent ( during the night he was too involved to notice ) . He went out to enquire ( lucky for Ayyub that apostle was on the road and did not have a sharp edged arrow handy) and saw Abu Ayyub (apparently Abu Ayyub did not get a captured woman in that raid). He asked him what he was doing near his tent.He replied: "I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, and till recently she was an unbeliever. I was really afraid for you on her account and was guarding you". The Prophet (either bought the lie or felt pity for the horny man who had put his life on line in the raid yet was without a captured woman and spent the night drooling) prayed for Abu Ayyub al-Ansari (Ibn Hisham, p. 766)
Apostle was so sick and tired of the horny men trying to violate his privacy that finally he made the law that eyes of peeping Toms can be put out.
Muslim,Book 025, Number 5370:
Abu Huraira reported having heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) say: He who peeped into the house of people without their consent, it is permissible for them to put out.
Well prophets huts had the best looking women and most action in Madina. You cannot blame the peeping Toms.
NEVER A DULL MOMENT
Allah had given the apostle libido of 30 men (as mentioned in one hadith above).He had so much energy that he did not leave his wives alone even during their periods..
Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299:
Narrated 'Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Aswad:
(on the authority of his father) 'Aisha said: "Whenever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her." 'Aisha added, "None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could."
Bukhar, iVolume 1, Book 6, Number 300:
Narrated Maimuna:
When ever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle any of his wives during the periods (menses), he used to ask her to wear an Izar.
WATCH BUT DON’T TOUCH
Although Apostle had sex with any of his wives whenever he wanted, but as a general rule he assigned one day for each wife. Slave girls did not get a separate day but were squeezed in whenever possible ( Once, he found his wife Habsa gone and her bed empty so he grabbed slave girl Maria and pulled her into the empty bed for a quickie, but Habsa walked in during action and went berserk. Almighty had to intervene with Q66.1-( Bukhari 3/43/6348) .
Apostle , in order to spread the cheer, used to invite all his wives to come and watch when he was in bed with one of them. Once while making love to Ayesha he wanted to grab Zainab who was standing next to the bed and watching. This did not go very well with Ayesha who was the youngest and of very possessive nature. A shouting match started between Ayesha and Zainab. The altercation continued till early morning and apostle had to leave for fajr prayer without finishing the job.
Bukhari, Book 008, Number 3450:
Anas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) had nine wives. So when he divided (his stay) with them, the turn of the first wife did not come but on the ninth (day). They (all the wives) used to gather every night in the house of one where he had to come (and stay that night). It was (the night when he had to stay) in the house of 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her), when Zainab came there. He (the Holy Prophet) stretched his hand towards her (Zainab), whereupon she ('A'isha) said: It is Zainab. Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) withdrew his hand. There was an altercation between the two until their voices became loud (and it was at that time) when Iqama was pronounced for prayer. There happened to come Abu Bakr and he heard their voices and said: Messenger of Allah, (kindly) come for prayer, and throw dust in their mouths. So the Prophet (may peace be upon him) went out.
WIN WIN SITUATION
Apostle had practical solutions for all problems. In one case a household freed slave (Salim) of Abu Hudaifa, an aging arab, became adult . Abu Hudaufa had a young and pretty wife. Naturally he was getting worried that Salim, a young and battle hardened stud ( he had already participated in Badr war), could screw his wife in his absence.He started harassing his wife about this matter. His wife told of this problem to the apostle. The apostle with all his wisdom solved the problem which made every one happy. He recommended that Salim suckle the breasts of Hudaifa’s wife which will make her unlawful for him. Hudaifa agreed to apostles solution and made Salim suckle his wives breasts. This made every one happy.. Old man Hudaifa was happy that his wife was now unlawful for Salim and he could go on business trips leaving them alone. Hudaifa’s wife was happy that her husband was off her back. Salim was more than happy to oblige and suckle Hudiafa’s wives breasts.. Apostle was a genius.
Bukhari, Book 008, Number 3425:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. Hudaifas’s wife came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that Hudaifa is getting suspicious of Salim and me.Wereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.
AHEAD OF HIS TIME
Apostle was way ahead of his time. What he knew then science does not know even now. For instance science does not know that baby resembles the partner who discharges first and that female discharge is thin and yellow..
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0608:
Anas b. Malik reported that Umm Sulaim narrated it that she asked the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) about a woman who sees in a dream what a man sees (sexual dream). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon bi m) said: In case a woman sees that, she must take a bath. Umm Sulaim said: I was bashful on account of that and said: Does it happen? Upon this the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Yes (it does happen), otherwise how can (a child) resemble her? Man's discharge (i. e. sperm) is thick and white and the discharge of woman is thin and yellow..
HUNGARY MUSLIMS CAN USE THEIR SLAVE GIRLS FOR PROSTITUTION
Question and answer on a muslim website (islamonline):
Q: Can a slave girl be used for prostitution .
A: Sex with slave girls and captured women is halal according to ayas 4.3, 4.24, 23.6, 33.52, and 70.30 and many hadiths . However using them as prostitutes is only allowed if she agrees to it. But if she desires chastity (and likes to restrict sex only with you) , you cannot force her . Force is allowed only under compulsion ( such as hunger) as the following aya indicates (same way as Allah had allowed muslims to use prostitutes with temporary nikah under compulsion):
Qur’an 24:34 “ Force not your slave-girls to whoredom (prostitution) if they desire chastity, that you may seek enjoyment of this life. [And here’s the freedom-to-pimp card:] But if anyone forces them, then after such compulsion, Allah is oft-forgiving.”
ISLAMIC WAY TO MAKE A WITNESS TALK
Islamic way to make a witness talk is to first soften him up by giving him/her a violent beating like you soften stool by giving stool softener. After that everything comes out easily. Following is an example in the case when Ayesha got lost on the way back from Mustaleeq raid and was accused of of having sex with a young jihadi who had found her up and had brought her back (while apostle was honey mooning with the newly acquired captured beauty Juavaria). Ayesha’s slave girl Buraya was called as witness. It is said that the beating was so violent that poor Buyraya defecated in her abhaya before she talked. A hadith says:
Ishaq:496 “Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.’ So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, ‘Tell the Apostle the truth.’” Then she told the truth.
DIVINE PUNISHMENT FOR FOOLING AROUND WITH APOSTLE’S SLAVE GIRLS WAS AUTUMATIC LOSS OF MANHOOD
A man fornicated with one of apostle’s slave girls (who had the honour of sleeping with Allah’s apostle). This was a violation of priveledged private parts, a serious offense punished by cutting off the offending penis by Jibraeel) (that is the reason the apostle prohibited the marriage of his widows and slave girls after his death, as he did not want the grooms to lose their manhood, disabling them to produce and to contribute to the growth of umma).
Muslim,Book 037, Number 6676:
Anas reported that a person was charged with fornication with the slavegirl of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him). Thereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to 'Ali: Go and strike his neck. 'Ali came to him and he found him in a well making his body cool. 'Ali said to him: Come out, and as he took hold of his hand and brought him out, he found that his sexual organ had been cut. Hadrat 'Ali refrained from striking his neck. He came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah's Messenger, he does not even have the sexual organ with him (Ali did not know that Jibraeel had already taken care of him).
By Ayesha Ahmed
ISLAMIC PEEPING TOMS
Apostle of God had great taste in women and only selected the ones with good looks and great figure ( later in life, when he had power and choice). Selection and acquiring of Zaynab, his first cousin and his adopted son Zaid’s wife emphasizes this point. Zainab had a beautiful face , but only after seeing her in the nude and liking what he saw, he chose to acquire her.
This is what TABARI says in "History of Tabari" Vol 8:
“One day Muhammad went out looking for Zayd. Now there was a covering of hair cloth over the doorway, but the wind had lifted the covering so that the doorway was uncovered. Zaynab was in her chamber, undressed, and admiration for her entered the heart of the Prophet. After that Allah made her unattractive to Zayd.’”
Almighty ordered their union thru Q 33.37
His 24 /7 sex life was also known in Madina..
Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:
"The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, "Had the Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men)."
He also enjoyed taking baths with his young and beautiful wives.
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0629:
'A'isha reported: I and the Messenger (may peace be upon him) took a bath from the same vessel and our hands alternated into it in the state that we had had sexual intercourse.
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0630:
'A'isha reported: I and the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) took a bath from one vessel which was placed between me and him and he would get ahead of me, so that I would say: Spare (some water for) me, spare (some water for) me; and she said that they had had sexual intercourse.
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0631:
Ibn Abbas said: Maimuna (the wife of the Holy Prophet) reported to me that she and the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) took a bath from one vessel.
All the above factors attracted many peeping Toms to his huts. Many enjoyed the views and action without ever being caught but some did get caught and got bloody eyes.
Bukhari , Volume 9, Book 83, Number 38a:
Narrated Anas:
A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at him to poke him stealthily.
Muslim, Book 025, Number 5369:
Anas b. Malik reported that a person peeped in some of the holes (in the doors) of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)..
Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 83, Number 38:
Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd As-Sa'idi:
A man peeped through a hole in the door of Allah's Apostle's house, and at that time, Allah's Apostle had a Midri (an iron comb or bar) with which he was rubbing his head. So when Allah's Apostle saw him, he said (to him), "If I had been sure that you were looking at me (through the door), I would have poked your eye with this (sharp iron bar)
One such peeping tom, Abu Ayyub Ansari, spent the night peeping into the tent where the 57 year old apostle was spending the night with gorgeous 17 year old Safia, acquired earlier in the day in the Khaibar raid. However Ayyub was smart and talked his way out when he was caught with his pants down. Read on:
According to a muslim wesbite muslimunited.org ( minus the sugar coating)
“Safiyah was captured in the Khaibar raid and was claimed by the apostle as his share of booty.. She was then seventeen. She was groomed and made-up for the Prophet by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik. They spent the night there. In the early dawn, the Prophet suspected some movement near the tent ( during the night he was too involved to notice ) . He went out to enquire ( lucky for Ayyub that apostle was on the road and did not have a sharp edged arrow handy) and saw Abu Ayyub (apparently Abu Ayyub did not get a captured woman in that raid). He asked him what he was doing near his tent.He replied: "I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, and till recently she was an unbeliever. I was really afraid for you on her account and was guarding you". The Prophet (either bought the lie or felt pity for the horny man who had put his life on line in the raid yet was without a captured woman and spent the night drooling) prayed for Abu Ayyub al-Ansari (Ibn Hisham, p. 766)
Apostle was so sick and tired of the horny men trying to violate his privacy that finally he made the law that eyes of peeping Toms can be put out.
Muslim,Book 025, Number 5370:
Abu Huraira reported having heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) say: He who peeped into the house of people without their consent, it is permissible for them to put out.
Well prophets huts had the best looking women and most action in Madina. You cannot blame the peeping Toms.
NEVER A DULL MOMENT
Allah had given the apostle libido of 30 men (as mentioned in one hadith above).He had so much energy that he did not leave his wives alone even during their periods..
Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299:
Narrated 'Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Aswad:
(on the authority of his father) 'Aisha said: "Whenever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her." 'Aisha added, "None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could."
Bukhar, iVolume 1, Book 6, Number 300:
Narrated Maimuna:
When ever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle any of his wives during the periods (menses), he used to ask her to wear an Izar.
WATCH BUT DON’T TOUCH
Although Apostle had sex with any of his wives whenever he wanted, but as a general rule he assigned one day for each wife. Slave girls did not get a separate day but were squeezed in whenever possible ( Once, he found his wife Habsa gone and her bed empty so he grabbed slave girl Maria and pulled her into the empty bed for a quickie, but Habsa walked in during action and went berserk. Almighty had to intervene with Q66.1-( Bukhari 3/43/6348) .
Apostle , in order to spread the cheer, used to invite all his wives to come and watch when he was in bed with one of them. Once while making love to Ayesha he wanted to grab Zainab who was standing next to the bed and watching. This did not go very well with Ayesha who was the youngest and of very possessive nature. A shouting match started between Ayesha and Zainab. The altercation continued till early morning and apostle had to leave for fajr prayer without finishing the job.
Bukhari, Book 008, Number 3450:
Anas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) had nine wives. So when he divided (his stay) with them, the turn of the first wife did not come but on the ninth (day). They (all the wives) used to gather every night in the house of one where he had to come (and stay that night). It was (the night when he had to stay) in the house of 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her), when Zainab came there. He (the Holy Prophet) stretched his hand towards her (Zainab), whereupon she ('A'isha) said: It is Zainab. Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) withdrew his hand. There was an altercation between the two until their voices became loud (and it was at that time) when Iqama was pronounced for prayer. There happened to come Abu Bakr and he heard their voices and said: Messenger of Allah, (kindly) come for prayer, and throw dust in their mouths. So the Prophet (may peace be upon him) went out.
WIN WIN SITUATION
Apostle had practical solutions for all problems. In one case a household freed slave (Salim) of Abu Hudaifa, an aging arab, became adult . Abu Hudaufa had a young and pretty wife. Naturally he was getting worried that Salim, a young and battle hardened stud ( he had already participated in Badr war), could screw his wife in his absence.He started harassing his wife about this matter. His wife told of this problem to the apostle. The apostle with all his wisdom solved the problem which made every one happy. He recommended that Salim suckle the breasts of Hudaifa’s wife which will make her unlawful for him. Hudaifa agreed to apostles solution and made Salim suckle his wives breasts. This made every one happy.. Old man Hudaifa was happy that his wife was now unlawful for Salim and he could go on business trips leaving them alone. Hudaifa’s wife was happy that her husband was off her back. Salim was more than happy to oblige and suckle Hudiafa’s wives breasts.. Apostle was a genius.
Bukhari, Book 008, Number 3425:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. Hudaifas’s wife came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that Hudaifa is getting suspicious of Salim and me.Wereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.
AHEAD OF HIS TIME
Apostle was way ahead of his time. What he knew then science does not know even now. For instance science does not know that baby resembles the partner who discharges first and that female discharge is thin and yellow..
Bukhari, Book 003, Number 0608:
Anas b. Malik reported that Umm Sulaim narrated it that she asked the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) about a woman who sees in a dream what a man sees (sexual dream). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon bi m) said: In case a woman sees that, she must take a bath. Umm Sulaim said: I was bashful on account of that and said: Does it happen? Upon this the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Yes (it does happen), otherwise how can (a child) resemble her? Man's discharge (i. e. sperm) is thick and white and the discharge of woman is thin and yellow..
HUNGARY MUSLIMS CAN USE THEIR SLAVE GIRLS FOR PROSTITUTION
Question and answer on a muslim website (islamonline):
Q: Can a slave girl be used for prostitution .
A: Sex with slave girls and captured women is halal according to ayas 4.3, 4.24, 23.6, 33.52, and 70.30 and many hadiths . However using them as prostitutes is only allowed if she agrees to it. But if she desires chastity (and likes to restrict sex only with you) , you cannot force her . Force is allowed only under compulsion ( such as hunger) as the following aya indicates (same way as Allah had allowed muslims to use prostitutes with temporary nikah under compulsion):
Qur’an 24:34 “ Force not your slave-girls to whoredom (prostitution) if they desire chastity, that you may seek enjoyment of this life. [And here’s the freedom-to-pimp card:] But if anyone forces them, then after such compulsion, Allah is oft-forgiving.”
ISLAMIC WAY TO MAKE A WITNESS TALK
Islamic way to make a witness talk is to first soften him up by giving him/her a violent beating like you soften stool by giving stool softener. After that everything comes out easily. Following is an example in the case when Ayesha got lost on the way back from Mustaleeq raid and was accused of of having sex with a young jihadi who had found her up and had brought her back (while apostle was honey mooning with the newly acquired captured beauty Juavaria). Ayesha’s slave girl Buraya was called as witness. It is said that the beating was so violent that poor Buyraya defecated in her abhaya before she talked. A hadith says:
Ishaq:496 “Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.’ So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, ‘Tell the Apostle the truth.’” Then she told the truth.
DIVINE PUNISHMENT FOR FOOLING AROUND WITH APOSTLE’S SLAVE GIRLS WAS AUTUMATIC LOSS OF MANHOOD
A man fornicated with one of apostle’s slave girls (who had the honour of sleeping with Allah’s apostle). This was a violation of priveledged private parts, a serious offense punished by cutting off the offending penis by Jibraeel) (that is the reason the apostle prohibited the marriage of his widows and slave girls after his death, as he did not want the grooms to lose their manhood, disabling them to produce and to contribute to the growth of umma).
Muslim,Book 037, Number 6676:
Anas reported that a person was charged with fornication with the slavegirl of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him). Thereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to 'Ali: Go and strike his neck. 'Ali came to him and he found him in a well making his body cool. 'Ali said to him: Come out, and as he took hold of his hand and brought him out, he found that his sexual organ had been cut. Hadrat 'Ali refrained from striking his neck. He came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah's Messenger, he does not even have the sexual organ with him (Ali did not know that Jibraeel had already taken care of him).
ISLAMIC HARAM AND HALAL
ISLAMIC HARAM AND HALAL
By: Ayesha Ahmad
It is haram to marry an adult pagan woman but halal to marry an underage Muslim child.
It is haram to steal an egg from a Muslim, punishable by cutting hands and feet, but halal to rob non Muslim's commercial caravans, rewarded by share of the booty.
It is haram to slaughter an animal in a name other than God but halal to slaughter a human being in the name of God.
It is haram to befriend a Jew or a Christian but halal to kill them and sleep with their wives and daughters.
It is haram to watch television but halal to watch beheadings and stoning.
It is haram for a woman even to show her face to a namahram man but halal for a man to disrobe and inspect a namahram woman before buying her in a slave market.
It is haram to buy mortgage to acquire a house for your family but halal to buy a woman from a slave market to sleep with her.
It is haram to trade alcohol but halal to trade human beings.
It is haram to listen to music but halal to listen to wailing of innocent women and children of the beheaded critics and apostates.
It is haram to see a movie but halal to kill an infidel.
It is haram to bet on a horse for entertainment but halal to steal a horse from an infidel for a living.
It is haram for a woman to have more than one husband but halal for a husband to have more than one wife.
It is haram for a husband to hurt his wife by treating other wives better, but halal for him to hurt them all by acquiring and sleeping with unlimited slaves and captive women.
It is haram for a wife to refuse her husband even on a camels back but halal for a husband to beat her up with a lash and green stick if she refuses him.
It is haram to even break the heart of a single innocent person if he is Muslim, but halal to behead all the innocent men of a community and sell their innocent women and children in slavery if they are non Muslims.
It is haram to attack and and injure enemy women but halal to enslave and rape them.
It is halal to stone a woman by burying her in a hole dug to her shoulders to maintain her "hijab" but haram to stone her on a flat ground and risk her "hijab".
It is halal to let young grils burn in fire but haram to rescue them if they do not have hijab.
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS OF ISLAM
By: Ayesha Ahmad
1 Thou shalt behead apostates, pagans and violators of blasphemy laws, it is halal for you.
2.Thou shalt extort money from Christians and Jews, the future hell dwellers, and if they refuse, kill them. But do not hurt their women and children, it is haram for you. However thou shalt enslave them, rape them or sell them for profit, it is halal for you.
3. Thou art guaranteed paradise and 72 big bosomed houris (and/or charming young boys), along with other fringes, if you cough up big bucks and take a trip to Mecca. Poverty stricken chaps and losers among you who cannot afford the trip, can earn the same privileges and more by participating in Jihad and killing the infidels. The jihadis will get the additional bonus of sharing the booty and beautiful women from the captured infidel lands.
4. Thou shalt marry a maximum of four wives at a time, except for my messenger whom I have exempted from this limit since his needs are equal to the needs of 30 horny men. However Thou art allowed to change your wives at will for variety and maintenance of your harem quality by divorcing them and acquiring younger specimens. Old bags lose their charm and excitement and must be replenished with a fresh supply. Try to acquire younger and better looking ones preferably virgins, leave the older ones and ugliest for the losers and old fogies.
5. Thou art allowed to have unlimited number of slaves and captive women and have sex with them, it is halal for you. Gay guys among you will have to wait for their fun, we will provide them with charming young boys in paradise. Alcohol lovers, hold your horses until you make it to the paradise, there will be rivers flowing with wine, up there.
6. For those amongst you who have pedophilic tendencies, we have made underage children halal for marriage and your carnal pleasure. However let them keep and play with their dolls while you are at it so that their attention is diverted from their pain and shock. Thou art also allowed to marry your daughter in law in case you keep getting excited by her voluptuous body every time you happen to see her in skimpy clothes.
7 Thou can demand sex from your women any time and anywhere, even on a camel's back. Thou shalt keep a lash or a green stick handy in case they refuse and need a good beating. However while doing it on a camels back with your wife, make sure that the hijab is maintained by keeping all yours and her body parts covered with the burka during the action. In case of doing it with your slave girl on a camel’s back hijab requirement is exempted, you are allowed to enjoy the sunshine and the fresh air along with her curves.
8. Thou shalt not listen to music, watch t.v. or go to the movies, these activities are haram for you. However thou shalt take your family to watch beheadings of apostates and kafirs, cutting of hands and feet of petty thieves, and stoning of adulterers, their viewing is halal for you.
9.Thou shalt not indulge in haram professions like selling non halal meat, food items with lard in it, or confectionary even with 1% liquor in it or working in interest charging banks and mortgage companies etc. Thou shalt only indulge in clean and halal means of earning livelihood like slave trading, looting infidel caravans and communities, killing Jews and acquiring their goods and properties, extortion of jizya and kharaj from captured lands, and booty earning bloody Jihads.
10. Ramadan Rules. Thou art not allowed the pleasure of eating or drinking during the fast (except for wives who have to taste food lest their husbands beat them up for cooking foul tasting food) but thou art allowed to kiss your wives, slaves (only female) and the women your right hand posses, to wait out the rough afternoon hungry period. Thou art not allowed to eat pigs but thou art allowed to pig out after breaking the fast. Thou art not allowed to have conjugal relationship during the fast but art allowed to break a fast with sex instead of food. Husbands are allowed to prohibit wives from fasting to keep the ladies fresh and beautiful for a romantic evening after a hard day of fasting.
By: Ayesha Ahmad
It is haram to marry an adult pagan woman but halal to marry an underage Muslim child.
It is haram to steal an egg from a Muslim, punishable by cutting hands and feet, but halal to rob non Muslim's commercial caravans, rewarded by share of the booty.
It is haram to slaughter an animal in a name other than God but halal to slaughter a human being in the name of God.
It is haram to befriend a Jew or a Christian but halal to kill them and sleep with their wives and daughters.
It is haram to watch television but halal to watch beheadings and stoning.
It is haram for a woman even to show her face to a namahram man but halal for a man to disrobe and inspect a namahram woman before buying her in a slave market.
It is haram to buy mortgage to acquire a house for your family but halal to buy a woman from a slave market to sleep with her.
It is haram to trade alcohol but halal to trade human beings.
It is haram to listen to music but halal to listen to wailing of innocent women and children of the beheaded critics and apostates.
It is haram to see a movie but halal to kill an infidel.
It is haram to bet on a horse for entertainment but halal to steal a horse from an infidel for a living.
It is haram for a woman to have more than one husband but halal for a husband to have more than one wife.
It is haram for a husband to hurt his wife by treating other wives better, but halal for him to hurt them all by acquiring and sleeping with unlimited slaves and captive women.
It is haram for a wife to refuse her husband even on a camels back but halal for a husband to beat her up with a lash and green stick if she refuses him.
It is haram to even break the heart of a single innocent person if he is Muslim, but halal to behead all the innocent men of a community and sell their innocent women and children in slavery if they are non Muslims.
It is haram to attack and and injure enemy women but halal to enslave and rape them.
It is halal to stone a woman by burying her in a hole dug to her shoulders to maintain her "hijab" but haram to stone her on a flat ground and risk her "hijab".
It is halal to let young grils burn in fire but haram to rescue them if they do not have hijab.
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS OF ISLAM
By: Ayesha Ahmad
1 Thou shalt behead apostates, pagans and violators of blasphemy laws, it is halal for you.
2.Thou shalt extort money from Christians and Jews, the future hell dwellers, and if they refuse, kill them. But do not hurt their women and children, it is haram for you. However thou shalt enslave them, rape them or sell them for profit, it is halal for you.
3. Thou art guaranteed paradise and 72 big bosomed houris (and/or charming young boys), along with other fringes, if you cough up big bucks and take a trip to Mecca. Poverty stricken chaps and losers among you who cannot afford the trip, can earn the same privileges and more by participating in Jihad and killing the infidels. The jihadis will get the additional bonus of sharing the booty and beautiful women from the captured infidel lands.
4. Thou shalt marry a maximum of four wives at a time, except for my messenger whom I have exempted from this limit since his needs are equal to the needs of 30 horny men. However Thou art allowed to change your wives at will for variety and maintenance of your harem quality by divorcing them and acquiring younger specimens. Old bags lose their charm and excitement and must be replenished with a fresh supply. Try to acquire younger and better looking ones preferably virgins, leave the older ones and ugliest for the losers and old fogies.
5. Thou art allowed to have unlimited number of slaves and captive women and have sex with them, it is halal for you. Gay guys among you will have to wait for their fun, we will provide them with charming young boys in paradise. Alcohol lovers, hold your horses until you make it to the paradise, there will be rivers flowing with wine, up there.
6. For those amongst you who have pedophilic tendencies, we have made underage children halal for marriage and your carnal pleasure. However let them keep and play with their dolls while you are at it so that their attention is diverted from their pain and shock. Thou art also allowed to marry your daughter in law in case you keep getting excited by her voluptuous body every time you happen to see her in skimpy clothes.
7 Thou can demand sex from your women any time and anywhere, even on a camel's back. Thou shalt keep a lash or a green stick handy in case they refuse and need a good beating. However while doing it on a camels back with your wife, make sure that the hijab is maintained by keeping all yours and her body parts covered with the burka during the action. In case of doing it with your slave girl on a camel’s back hijab requirement is exempted, you are allowed to enjoy the sunshine and the fresh air along with her curves.
8. Thou shalt not listen to music, watch t.v. or go to the movies, these activities are haram for you. However thou shalt take your family to watch beheadings of apostates and kafirs, cutting of hands and feet of petty thieves, and stoning of adulterers, their viewing is halal for you.
9.Thou shalt not indulge in haram professions like selling non halal meat, food items with lard in it, or confectionary even with 1% liquor in it or working in interest charging banks and mortgage companies etc. Thou shalt only indulge in clean and halal means of earning livelihood like slave trading, looting infidel caravans and communities, killing Jews and acquiring their goods and properties, extortion of jizya and kharaj from captured lands, and booty earning bloody Jihads.
10. Ramadan Rules. Thou art not allowed the pleasure of eating or drinking during the fast (except for wives who have to taste food lest their husbands beat them up for cooking foul tasting food) but thou art allowed to kiss your wives, slaves (only female) and the women your right hand posses, to wait out the rough afternoon hungry period. Thou art not allowed to eat pigs but thou art allowed to pig out after breaking the fast. Thou art not allowed to have conjugal relationship during the fast but art allowed to break a fast with sex instead of food. Husbands are allowed to prohibit wives from fasting to keep the ladies fresh and beautiful for a romantic evening after a hard day of fasting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)